Quarterly Review and Market Outlook โ 3rd Quarter 2023
โYou can only predict things after they have happened.โ
โ Eugene Ionesco
Conventional wisdom entering this year said that getting inflation under control would require pain, the only question was how much. When the Fed published their economic forecast for 2023, they predicted that higher interest rates would slow the economy and put two million people out of work. Inflation would fall because Americans as a whole would have less income to spend. No pain, no gain.
A funny thing happened on the way to the recession. The Fed raised rates, inflation came down, and the labor marketโฆgot stronger. Most measures of economic growth accelerated in the third quarter and the Fed now expects US Gross Domestic Product to grow 2.1% this year, up from 0.5% in their December 2022 forecast. At least until now, there is no denying the hard facts of the economy have outperformed the prevailing bearish sentiment.
We highlighted the Fedโs pessimism at the time and argued against taking the gloomy predictions too seriously. When inflation finally showed clear signs of progress, the Fed slowed the pace of hikes even though the labor market did not behave according to their models. The pandemic economy was weird and hard to forecast. The Fed has over 400 PhD economists, but they do not have a crystal ball.
Markets have come a long way this year, swinging from recession to soft landing to no landing at all. We cautioned against economic pessimism before, now we push back a bit against the optimism. The reality of the pandemic economy has never been as hot or as cold as it seemed in the moment.
Quarterly Review
Investor pessimism has kept asset prices lower than they might be otherwise. The S&P 500 Index fell 3% in the third quarter with similar returns from small and international stocks. Long-term Treasuries sold off due to higher rates while credit-sensitive bonds held up relatively well. The outperformance of riskier segments of the bond market suggests that stock declines were driven by rates more than worries about earnings growth.
For the year, the S&P 500 Index remains solidly positive with performance heavily concentrated in a few large companies benefiting from excitement around artificial intelligence (AI). Other areas within the US large cap universe have produced modest gains reflecting positive earnings momentum, but rising interest rates have kept a ceiling on valuation multiples.
International markets produced broader gains, with many areas outperforming their US peers. However, the US Dollar has strengthened considerably during the year which offset some or all of these gains. Despite the low multiples available in international stocks, we tend to favor US markets for several reasons, one of which is our desire to limit currency risk.
Market Outlook
The technology giants (e.g. Microsoft) that are the core of the US indexes are perhaps the only area within markets arguably priced for optimism. We believe they deserve premium valuations; the question remains how much. They continue to be the foundation of a diversified portfolio because they have characteristics hard to find elsewhere. They possess natural monopolies enabled by the internet and have built fortress balance sheets that can survive and even thrive during a downturn. They earn massive profits and are still able to reinvest those profits at attractive rates of return.
Outside of these names, we see a universe of reasonably priced companies with characteristics we believe drive an attractive return profile regardless of the environmentโstrong earnings growth, defensive balance sheets, and consistent dividends. With investors focused on the AI story, this โotherโ group of businesses has grown relatively more attractive. The median S&P 500 stock trades at a Price-to-Earnings ratio 15% cheaper than its 10-year average. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is about 20% richer.
Small company indexes are broadly inexpensive but include many stocks that lack the profitability and balance sheet characteristics we favor. We use strategies to separate the wheat from the chaff and believe long-term investors will be compensated over time.
Fixed Income remains compelling across the board. Attractive yields on cash and short-term bonds protect purchasing power but also pose reinvestment risk. If the Fed has to cut rates next year, those yields could fall quickly. Income-focused investors should consider locking in high-quality longer-term cash flows.
โ
It is no coincidence the most attractive market entry point of the last decade came during one of the most challenging years. In 2011, the US recovery seemed to be stalling, house prices continued to fall, and there was a banking crisis in Europe. Technology stocks were available at bargain basement prices because it was hard to buy anything with confidence.
While stocks are not in the discount bin today, investors may one day look back with similar nostalgia. Higher returns are available in more placesโstocks, bonds, even cash. Diversification may be boring, but it has rarely looked so appealing.
Please reach out with any questions or comments.
The information presented in this document is for general informational and educational purposes and is not specific to any individualโs personal circumstances. Nothing in this document constitutes, or shall be relied upon as, investment, legal, or tax advice to any person. The information in this document is provided effective as of the date of its publication, does not necessarily reflect the most current status or development, and is subject to revision at any time. Investing involves risk, and past performance does not necessarily predict future results. None of Waverly, or any of its officers, members, or affiliates, in any way warrant or guarantee the success of any action that anyone may take in reliance on any statements or recommendations in this document.
Waverly Advisors, LLC (โWaverlyโ) is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Waverly, including investment strategies, fees and objectives can be found in Waverlyโs ADV Part 2A Brochure and Form CRS (Customer Relationship Summary), available at https://waverly-advisors.com/.
You should not assume that any information provided serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Waverly. This information should be used as a reference only.
Investment advisory services are offered by Waverly Advisors, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ยฉ 2026 Waverly Advisors, LLC. All rights reserved.
For more information, please see our other important disclosures: Disclosure – Waverly Advisors (https://waverly-advisors.com/disclosure/)
Quarterly Review and Outlook โ Q3 2023
Quarterly Review and Market Outlook โ 3rd Quarter 2023
โYou can only predict things after they have happened.โ
โ Eugene Ionesco
Conventional wisdom entering this year said that getting inflation under control would require pain, the only question was how much. When the Fed published their economic forecast for 2023, they predicted that higher interest rates would slow the economy and put two million people out of work. Inflation would fall because Americans as a whole would have less income to spend. No pain, no gain.
A funny thing happened on the way to the recession. The Fed raised rates, inflation came down, and the labor marketโฆgot stronger. Most measures of economic growth accelerated in the third quarter and the Fed now expects US Gross Domestic Product to grow 2.1% this year, up from 0.5% in their December 2022 forecast. At least until now, there is no denying the hard facts of the economy have outperformed the prevailing bearish sentiment.
We highlighted the Fedโs pessimism at the time and argued against taking the gloomy predictions too seriously. When inflation finally showed clear signs of progress, the Fed slowed the pace of hikes even though the labor market did not behave according to their models. The pandemic economy was weird and hard to forecast. The Fed has over 400 PhD economists, but they do not have a crystal ball.
Markets have come a long way this year, swinging from recession to soft landing to no landing at all. We cautioned against economic pessimism before, now we push back a bit against the optimism. The reality of the pandemic economy has never been as hot or as cold as it seemed in the moment.
Quarterly Review
Investor pessimism has kept asset prices lower than they might be otherwise. The S&P 500 Index fell 3% in the third quarter with similar returns from small and international stocks. Long-term Treasuries sold off due to higher rates while credit-sensitive bonds held up relatively well. The outperformance of riskier segments of the bond market suggests that stock declines were driven by rates more than worries about earnings growth.
For the year, the S&P 500 Index remains solidly positive with performance heavily concentrated in a few large companies benefiting from excitement around artificial intelligence (AI). Other areas within the US large cap universe have produced modest gains reflecting positive earnings momentum, but rising interest rates have kept a ceiling on valuation multiples.
International markets produced broader gains, with many areas outperforming their US peers. However, the US Dollar has strengthened considerably during the year which offset some or all of these gains. Despite the low multiples available in international stocks, we tend to favor US markets for several reasons, one of which is our desire to limit currency risk.
Market Outlook
The technology giants (e.g. Microsoft) that are the core of the US indexes are perhaps the only area within markets arguably priced for optimism. We believe they deserve premium valuations; the question remains how much. They continue to be the foundation of a diversified portfolio because they have characteristics hard to find elsewhere. They possess natural monopolies enabled by the internet and have built fortress balance sheets that can survive and even thrive during a downturn. They earn massive profits and are still able to reinvest those profits at attractive rates of return.
Outside of these names, we see a universe of reasonably priced companies with characteristics we believe drive an attractive return profile regardless of the environmentโstrong earnings growth, defensive balance sheets, and consistent dividends. With investors focused on the AI story, this โotherโ group of businesses has grown relatively more attractive. The median S&P 500 stock trades at a Price-to-Earnings ratio 15% cheaper than its 10-year average. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is about 20% richer.
Small company indexes are broadly inexpensive but include many stocks that lack the profitability and balance sheet characteristics we favor. We use strategies to separate the wheat from the chaff and believe long-term investors will be compensated over time.
Fixed Income remains compelling across the board. Attractive yields on cash and short-term bonds protect purchasing power but also pose reinvestment risk. If the Fed has to cut rates next year, those yields could fall quickly. Income-focused investors should consider locking in high-quality longer-term cash flows.
โ
It is no coincidence the most attractive market entry point of the last decade came during one of the most challenging years. In 2011, the US recovery seemed to be stalling, house prices continued to fall, and there was a banking crisis in Europe. Technology stocks were available at bargain basement prices because it was hard to buy anything with confidence.
While stocks are not in the discount bin today, investors may one day look back with similar nostalgia. Higher returns are available in more placesโstocks, bonds, even cash. Diversification may be boring, but it has rarely looked so appealing.
Please reach out with any questions or comments.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
The information presented in this document is for general informational and educational purposes and is not specific to any individualโs personal circumstances. Nothing in this document constitutes, or shall be relied upon as, investment, legal, or tax advice to any person. The information in this document is provided effective as of the date of its publication, does not necessarily reflect the most current status or development, and is subject to revision at any time. Investing involves risk, and past performance does not necessarily predict future results. None of Waverly, or any of its officers, members, or affiliates, in any way warrant or guarantee the success of any action that anyone may take in reliance on any statements or recommendations in this document.
Waverly Advisors, LLC (โWaverlyโ) is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Waverly, including investment strategies, fees and objectives can be found in Waverlyโs ADV Part 2A Brochure and Form CRS (Customer Relationship Summary), available at https://waverly-advisors.com/.
You should not assume that any information provided serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Waverly. This information should be used as a reference only.
Investment advisory services are offered by Waverly Advisors, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ยฉ 2026 Waverly Advisors, LLC. All rights reserved.
For more information, please see our other important disclosures: Disclosure – Waverly Advisors (https://waverly-advisors.com/disclosure/)
Follow Us
Share this post on:โ
Clay joined the firm in 2022 when BT Wealth Management was acquired by Waverly Advisors. Clay is a Partner and serves as Chief Investment Officer. He runs the Investment Committee, the Private Markets Committee, and oversees the firmโs investment process. Prior to Waverly, Clay was a Director with Zurich Alternative Asset Management, a subsidiary of Zurich Insurance Company that managed more than $15 billion in investments spanning Real Estate, Private Equity, and Hedge Funds. Before Zurich, Clay served as a senior analyst focusing on private markets for Erste Bank, and prior to that for a single-family office. Clay has an MS in Economics and BBA in Finance from the University of Kentucky.
John is the Chief Economist at Waverly Advisors. He is also a Partner of the firm and a Wealth Advisor.
Related Insight
Waverly Advisors Acquires Heartwood Wealth Advisors
Richmond-based acquisition expands Waverlyโs footprint in Virginia BIRMINGHAM, Ala. โ [September 29, 2026] โ Waverly Advisors, LLC (โWaverlyโ), a federally…
Barronโs 2026 Top 100 RIA Firms
Waverly Advisors Named to Barronโs 2026 Top 100 RIA Firms Waverly Advisors is proud to be recognized by Barronโs as…
Investors are Baffled the Market Keeps Going Up
โAll of humanityโs problems stem from manโs inability to sit quietly in a room alone.โ โ Blaise Pascal, 17th century…